Archive for May, 2008

News - How to start a firm from home

Tuesday, May 27th, 2008
Starting a business from home is a great way to avoid having to rent an office or other premises.

However, as small business expert George Derbyshire explains, there are a number of things to remember if you want to give your new firm the best chance of success.


QUESTION

Jean Bridge, UK


Where is the best place to find information on starting up a small business from home?

I would like to know about tax implications, marketing, and anything I should look out for. Thank you.


ANSWER

George Derbyshire, chief executive of the National Federation of Enterprise Agencies


Much will depend on the type of business you are starting.

However, in general terms, the areas you will need to address when you work from home are as follows.

The most important thing is to decide whether you are forming a limited company, or whether you will run your new business on a self-employed basis.

You are allowed to be employed in your day job and self-employed in your new business at home at the same time.

The only legal is to declare your intention to the local HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) office.

It is easy to register as self-employed. You can go online at HMRC’s website and it is all fully explained.

Ask George Derbyshire a question

A limited company is a more expensive option and your decision for going down this route would depend very much on the possible turnover you may have and your total tax situation.

You will be required to complete two forms, which get you registered and start your Class 2 National Insurance payments (currently 2.10/week).

They will want this to go “direct debit” from a bank account and, although it is not a legal requirement, you should have a separate bank account to run the business through, especially if you have existing employment and other forms of making money.

Legally, that is all you need to do to get started, unless you expect to earn above the VAT threshold (currently 61,000 annually). If that is the case, you will have to register for VAT.

Planning ?

Look on the internet and other sources to check no-one else is trading under the same name as you.

If you are accepting money for services, then you will need to be insured on a public liability basis.

On any publicly-facing website you run, you will need to consider disclaimers and terms and conditions.

You may also need to contact your local council to ask about planning permission.

If you are unlikely to be causing disturbance to your neighbours through the operation of the business, there should not be a problem, but it also depends on the terms of tenancy/ownership of your property.

You will also need to inform your home insurance company that you are operating a business, as failure to do so may result in your policy being voided in the event of a claim.

Think about who will be answering the phone. If you use your phone for both domestic and business, how does this affect your ? Who will answer it, will a message be passed on etc?

There are certain benefits of some of your domestic costs against the business, if you are using an appropriate room on a permanent basis.

Have you got space to store surplus materials, if appropriate? These are bound to accumulate. Will they be safe and secure?

For more specific advice relevant to your business, you should contact your local Enterprise Agency. Many of them can offer a free consultation session.

You can search for your nearest agency on the National Federation of Enterprise Agency (NFEA) website, or by calling 01234 831623.

You can also ask a question online, which is sent to a local business adviser, on the NFEA’s Small Business Advice website.



Terms & Conditions


Return to top

News - Two jailed over £1.5m home squat

Monday, May 26th, 2008
Two squatters who moved into an elderly woman’s 1.5m home while she stayed with her sick sister have been jailed.


Milly home of 60 years in Bayswater, west London, was found in such a state it nearly killed her, Road magistrates heard.


Antonio Pompili, 29, and Emmanuel Lamy, 24, were sentenced to five and four months for illegally being on closed premises and extracting electricity.


But no-one has been charged for the damage to the property.


Police said doors had been taken off hinges, windows smashed and paintings damaged.


It is still boarded up, nearly four months after the men were removed.


Ms Martinson, 85, who is staying with her sister, fears repairing the property will cost thousands and says the insurance has lapsed.


‘Very sad and scared’


In a statement she told the court the house had been filled with happy memories for her, but when she first saw it after the squatters had been removed it nearly killed her.


“She felt very sad and scared, nothing like this had every happened to her before,” said prosecutor Christine .


“She doesn’t have any fight left in her and she doesn’t look forward to anything any more.


“All she wanted for the rest of her life was to live in her own home and not be disturbed by anybody else.”

Milly Martinson

Ms Martinson had lived in her Bayswater home for 60 years


Both Pompili, an Italian who had hoped to find work as a computer , and Lamy, who came from France to find work as an electrician, said they did not know the property was occupied.


They said they had been told by others at a hostel they could stay at the house if they cleaned up a room.


Both men admitted being among squatters at the property. They pleaded guilty to illegally extracting electricity from the property and unlawfully being in closed premises.


Pompili, Yimi Yangye said her client, who had been in the house for about 10 days, was “very remorseful”.


I am afraid to go to the place
Milly Martinson


Alex Rose, for Lamy, said his client had gone to the house when it was already a squat and had previously been a “law abiding citizen”.


Lamy, of Princes Square, Bayswater, had only been there two days when he was arrested, the court heard. He is appealing against his sentence.


Sentencing them, district judge Quentin Purdy said it was clear the use of the property was “beyond anything that would vaguely be described as acceptable.”


Last week Matteo Barbarini, 27, was jailed for four months after admitting similar offences.


Outside court Ms Martinson, a retired Royal British Legion secretary, said: “I am afraid to go to the place,especially at night now - I don’t know who will be running out of the rooms.”

News - Tsunami families in ‘legal limbo’

Saturday, May 24th, 2008

Government officials are looking into the plight of Britons left in financial and legal limbo after their relatives went missing in the Asian tsunami.

Hundreds of Britons are missing, feared dead, so that death certificates cannot be issued and their assets are frozen.

Several government departments are looking at whether “criteria necessary for proof of death” must be changed, the Foreign Office says.

But insurers say life policies could still pay out without certificates.

The relatives of some of the missing Britons are calling for a change in the law to allow interim death certificates to be issued.

Without them, they say they will not be able to inherit their loved ones’ assets or sell property belonging to them.

However, insurers say life assurance policies can be still be paid out without certificates.

Among those calling for a change is Kath Lloyd-Jones, 56, of Warwickshire.

British tourist Barry Lloyd-Jones

Barry Lloyd-Jones has not been seen since Boxing Day

Her husband Barry, 68, has not been seen since the tsunami hit as the couple were having breakfast on a beach in Thailand on Boxing Day morning.

She told BBC News: “It’s hard coming to terms with the actuality of these events, particularly when you feel it’s unnecessary.

“The hardship of day-to-day living, the hardship of finances being tied up, the prospect of ‘My God, am I going to die before all this is resolved?’ - I call that pretty hard.”

The seven-year rule is intended to stop people who deliberately go missing being absolved of their financial and legal responsibilities.

circumstances’

It is possible for bereaved families to apply to have their relatives declared officially dead before the seven years have lapsed but each case would have to be considered by the probate court.

The Foreign Office has confirmed the government is urgently looking into whether special arrangements could be made for the families of missing Britons, because of “exceptional circumstances” surrounding the disaster.

Officials are examining the “criteria necessary for proof of death”, a spokesman said.

The Home Office later issued a statement saying it was working to establish “the quickest possible process” to enable the Foreign Office register deaths overseas without a formal identification process.

It added that a key issue was to insure police could “complete their investigations and establish whether, on the balance of probabilities, an individual is dead”.

Meanwhile, insurance companies have spoken out to dispel fears that bereaved families might have problems claiming on their loved-ones’ insurance policies without death certificates.

The Association of British Insurers, which has 400 members, said life assurance companies would not automatically require a death certificate.



Whatever other problems there may be, there should not be a problem with life insurance being paid


Malcolm Tarling

British tsunami victims

Spokesman Malcolm Tarling said it was standard practice to deal with claims, even without a body.

He said: “They are not going to say ‘No death certificate, no claim.’

“Where there is reasonable evidence to suggest that the person is missing, presumed dead, for example, someone was booked into a hotel which was badly affected, then insurers will deal with the claim.

“We are keen to reassure people that whatever other problems there may be, there should not be a problem with life insurance being paid.”

So far 51 Britons have been confirmed dead in the disaster, which struck south-east Asia on Boxing Day.

Of those still missing, 349 are people who are known to have been in the areas struck by the tsunami, and who, it is considered, would have made contact by now had they survived.

Another 568, many of them backpackers, are thought to have been in the vicinity and have not been heard from since the disaster.

It is feared the bodies of many of those killed may never be found.

Others may eventually be identified by DNA testing among the thousands of bodies of various left in the wake of the tsunami but this is likely to take at least a year, officials have warned.

News - Lost luggage payouts increase

Friday, May 23rd, 2008

Airline passengers will now receive more compensation for delayed, lost or damaged luggage, following new international rules.

Under the newly ratified Montreal Convention, payouts will be related to the value of the goods, and passengers can receive compensation from airlines of up to 800.

The legislation applies to all flights departing or arriving in any of the 54 countries that have signed up.

Previously, the Warsaw Convention awarded passengers only 12 per kilogram of luggage lost or damaged. This cost guideline was set in 1929.



We are concerned with the practical implications


James Freemantle, Air Transport Users Council

For passengers such as BBC Radio 4’s Money Box listener Andrew, the previous rules seemed hopelessly outdated in compensating him for his stolen digital camera.

He told the programme:

“As the camera - that had cost me 600 - was weighing less than one kilogram, British Midland offered me 12.78. It was insulting.”

Proof of purchase

A from the Association of British Travel Agents said the new rules are a “welcome improvement”. But travellers should not relax all caution when handing over their bags.

Industry Affairs Advisor at the Air Transport Users Council, James Freemantle has concerns over whether or not airlines will actually pay up.

“We are concerned with the practical implications,” he told the programme.



This is going to cause arguments between passengers and airlines


Mr Freemantle

“Airlines are likely to want to have proof of purchase of items or bags that have been lost or stolen. This is going to cause arguments between passengers and airlines.”

Many passengers will simply not have receipts for the contents of their bags, which would make it difficult to get compensation for clothes, toiletries and other everyday items.

The advice from Mr Freemantle is to keep receipts for any item that you buy to take away with you.

Travellers are however more likely to keep receipts for valuable items.
But in practice, Mr Freemantle said people could still end up with a dispute.

“Airlines may try to say that they are not liable for valuable items. But, the legislation makes no exceptions, therefore they are liable for items such as cameras,” he said.

In the event of such a dispute, the airline would be contravening the Convention and passengers should contact the Air Transport Users Council.

Making a claim

One bag in every 100 goes missing. If it happens to you the advice is to report it immediately at the lost baggage desk. Any damage would also be inspected and noted there.

Passengers are then required to fill in a Property Irregularity Report detailing the extent of loss or damage, and the value of goods affected.

BBC RADIO 4’s MONEY BOX
The programme was broadcast on Saturday, 3 July, 2004

Programme information

Only once this form is handed in have you made a claim. You are likely to need to provide proof of purchase for all items that you claim for.

If the luggage simply does not arrive, a claim will only be made for delayed baggage at that point.

Belongings are not officially “lost” until 21 days have passed without them being returned. Once it is declared “lost”, you then have seven days to submit a claim.

What happens next remains to be seen. With margins becoming narrower in an competitive industry, the additional cost will be hard for airlines to absorb.

While the Montreal Convention is an improvement, Mr Freemantle recommended that all travellers take out insurance that specifically covers for baggage loss or damage.

BBC Radio 4’s Money Box was broadcast on Saturday, 3 July, 2004, at 1204 BST.

The programme was repeated on Sunday, 4 July, 2004 at 2102 BST

News - Ten golden pension rules

Thursday, May 22nd, 2008

The Pensions Commission report revealed the extent of the UK’s retirement shortfall. A pensions expert outlines ten simple steps to securing a retirement.

Don’t count on the state

As a nation, we are all living longer.

This means that in the years to come, there will be many more pensioners than now and the value of the basic state pension may struggle to keep pace.

Don’t put off starting a pension

UK’S PENSION CRISIS
Why many are heading for poverty in old age

At-a-glance

Because of the way compound interest works, the earlier you start a pension plan, the less it will cost you.

So start early and pay in as much as you can.

As a rule of thumb, a good starting point would be about half your age as a percentage of your income.

So at 22, that would mean 11% of your income but if you cannot afford that much any lower amount would be useful as a start.

Explore other ways to save

Property, individual savings accounts (ISAs), even paintings and other works of art are all possible alternatives.


Try to make yourself familiar with the rules of your scheme and how it works

Indeed the more you diversify your investments, the better it usually is.

However, with an approved pension plan you receive tax relief on all your contributions at your highest personal rate. And for the most part, the fund that you build up is also allowed to grow tax free.

Show an interest in your pension

Try to make yourself familiar with the rules of your scheme and how it works.

Make sure you know with a personal pension or money purchase type company scheme what investment vehicle is being used for your monies and make sure you are comfortable with the level of risk chosen.

Join your employer scheme

Always consider joining your workplace pension scheme, the employer will be contributing and for you not to join is therefore tantamount to giving up pay.

One exception might be in a salary-related scheme if the company were to be insecure and in risk of becoming insolvent.

With the advent of the pension protection fund next year, however, some of the risks for members will be considerably reduced.


Unless you feel very confident, always take professional advice before making important decisions

Review your pension regularly

You should check the regular pension statements you receive to make sure your plan is on course to deliver the level of income you expect to receive when you retire.

Get a forecast of your state pension

This will enable you to establish whether there are any gaps in your National Insurance contributions record and gives you the opportunity of making this good by paying voluntary contributions.

Give yourself time to act and get a forecast at least ten years before you are due to retire.

To obtain a forecast, ring the Pensions Forecasting Service on 0845 3000168

Keep paperwork safe

These papers may be essential later on.

It is no use trying to challenge something or for example make out a case for without the necessary evidence some 20, 30 or 40 years after the event.

Take professional advice

Unless you feel very confident, always take professional advice before making important decisions, such as changing your pension provider or seeking a transfer.

If you do not have a regular financial adviser you can obtain details of three advisers in your area by contacting IFA Promotions on 0800 0853250.

For free advice on issues other than investment and guidance generally, you can also ring the OPAS Helpline on 0845 6012923.

Always ask questions

Remember, there is no such thing as a stupid question about pensions

Pensions can be immensely complicated and people sometimes feel inadequate.

You should not worry about this.

You have a right to have things properly explained to you in language you can understand and should not feel inhibited about asking the most basic questions.

Opas are running a free helpline for women with pension problems the number is 0845 600 0806.

The views expressed are solely those of Malcolm McLean’s and not the BBC’s. Any guidance is for general information only and does not constitute financial or legal advice.

News - Britons’ wealth ‘relies on homes’

Wednesday, May 21st, 2008

More than half of Britons’ personal wealth on average is tied up in their homes, research suggests.


A decade ago, about 40% of personal wealth was tied up in this way.


Rising house prices are the key reason for the growth in importance of housing to many Britons, according to UK insurer Prudential.


While the importance of property to peoples’ finances has been growing the role that pensions, life insurance and shares have , it added.


A decade ago, 58% of UK household wealth was made up of financial assets such as pensions, life assurances, shares and savings.


But since 2001, the value of non-financial assets, such as housing, has risen dramatically, while pensions and shares have suffered from stock market .


And the dominant role of property in people’s finances is set to continue. The insurer predicted that by 2009, 60% of people’s wealth would be tied up in bricks and mortar.


“It is interesting to see how important property has become in constituting our main source of financial wealth,” said Ali Crossley, director of Lifetime Mortgage at Prudential.


“House prices have risen over the last 20 years and this is one of the reasons why we have seen such a shift in wealth ,” he added.


Rate danger


The fact that so much of UK personal wealth is tied up in property has long been a cause for concern for some economists.


In recent years, many people have borrowed against the increased value of their home to fund consumer spending, pay off other debts or fund home improvements.


The concern is that rises in UK interest rates could tip many people’s finances over the edge.


The Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) meets on Wednesday to discuss the next move in UK interest rates.


Most experts are expecting the MPC to keep rates steady, but a rise from their current level of 5.25% is a possibility.

News - Katrina damage ‘could top $25bn’

Monday, May 19th, 2008
Hurricane Katrina could cost insurers as much as $25bn (14bn), experts say, although the financial impact may be less severe than first thought.


Katrina has left a trail of destruction in its wake, with hundreds feared dead and a million homes left without power.


It has caused millions of dollars worth of damage in Louisiana and Mississippi.


Predictions of the final cost to insurers range from $9bn to $25bn, making it potentially more costly than the 2001 World Trader Center attacks.


Insurers say it could take weeks before they get a firm idea exactly how much Katrina could cost them given that large areas ravaged by the hurricane are still under water.


Export concern


Much will depend on the underwater damage to ports and seaways, according to Peter Zeihan of Stratfor, an economic and political based in Austin, Texas.


The US is the biggest grain exporter in the world, and most of those exports travel down the Mississippi.


“The big question is how much the rivers and ports have been silted up. It could be fixed in two days; it could be two months. If it’s the longer end, we’re going right into the grain harvest,” said Mr Zeihan.


Some analysts say it is possible that Katrina could be as expensive as 1992’s Hurricane Andrew - which at $21bn was the most expensive in US history.


Differing estimates


Although the storm was downgraded from category five to three, winds reached up to 155mph (250k/ph), causing damage across Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama.


Katrina is in a range comparable to Andrew, cost-wise
David Bresch, Swiss Re


US insurers have put the likely cost of claims at up to $25bn while Munich Re, the world’s top reinsurer, estimated a slightly lower figure of $15bn-$20bn. It has said the costs would not impact its profits.


Analysts at JP Morgan estimate that Hannover Re will have to pay out about $198m, while they believe Swiss Re may face a $490m bill.


“Katrina is in a range comparable to Andrew, cost-wise,” David Bresch, head of the Atmospheric Perils Group at Swiss Re, said.


Lloyd’s of London has said it is braced for big claims, mostly from offshore energy installations, damage to property and costs of lost business.


Meanwhile, Allianz, Zurich Financial and Axa have yet to speculate on their likely exposure to Katrina.


Premiums ’safe’


However, experts also said Katrina’s path - which took it around the most densely populated areas - may have lessened its financial impact.


“Projections that this is going to be the worst ever are probably off… we’re probably looking at something that’s in the top five,” said Robert Hartwig, chief economist at the Insurance Information Institute.


MOST COSTLY US HURRICANES*
Andrew - 1992 - cost $21bn
Charley - 2004 - $15bn
Ivan - 2004 - $14.2bn
Frances -2004 - $8.9bn
Hugo - 1989 - $7bn
*Source: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (adjusted for inflation)


Analysts have also played down the possible impact on insurance premiums.


Only if the cost of Katrina grew so large that it could threaten to drive some insurers out of business would it force the industry to increase rates across the board, said analysts at US group Fox-Pitt Kelton.


It would take a “devastatingly large loss” of $50bn or more to push all non-life insurance premium rates upwards, said Fox-Pitt.


Only storm-affected liabilities - such as property in the US - would see insurance premium rates increase, it added.


Oil impact


Insurance consultancy Eqecat has already reduced its estimate of damage-related claims from an initial $15bn-$30bn to a maximum of $16bn after the eye of the storm veered away from the centre of New Orleans.


Eqecat said its estimate did not include damage to oil rigs in the Gulf of Mexico - many of which are more than 25 years old - and warned that predicting damages could be tricky.


“We do know the storm path went through an area where there are a number of production platforms,” said Rick Clinton, Eqecat’s president.


“When you start looking at the older platforms, built prior to 1980 and 1970, that will have a dramatic impact.”


Oil price fears


However, aside from the insurance market, the huge storm could have other knock-on effects.


If it leads to higher oil prices for a considerable time, that could have a serious effect on some big US airlines who are either struggling to avoid bankruptcy - as in the case of Delta and Northwest - or trying to come out of Chapter 11, like United Airways and US Air.


And Standard & Poor’s says that the storm could lower US GDP in the third quarter of the year, as energy and tourism output drops.


But the company says that economic growth will recover as spending on rebuilding would boost growth.

News - Iraqi businessman battles for new start

Sunday, May 18th, 2008


“We had taken all precautions. We built concrete blocks and closed the street,” Mr Shaheen says.


But the bomber managed to drive his load over the concrete defences, and although guards opened fire to try to stop him, he managed to reach the front of the Shaheen Hotel, where the vehicle exploded.


Iraqi police and the US military said it was packed with between 500 kilograms and one tonne of explosives, Mr Shaheen says.



The attack is thought to have been targeted at Iraqi Labour and Social Affairs Minister Sami Azara al-Majoun, who had been staying at the hotel for four months.


Picking up the pieces


Mr Shaheen is hoping to rebuild the hotel and have it up and running again soon, although without insurance - “not in Iraq” - this will require hard cash and patience.


Given the country’s state of flux, it will be difficult to find the materials to replace the damaged structure.

Scene of hotel blast

Iraqi insurgents have targetted Iraqis who co-operate with the US forces

Mr Shaheen, who had been planning the of a second hotel, has now put all his plans on hold while rebuilding his first property. But he is hoping to attract foreign investors for the reconstruction of his first.


He believes the bombing would not have happened under Saddam Hussein.

“Suicide bombers are who are coming from outside Iraq - al-Qaeda or others. Under Saddam, people suffered, but did not do things like this,” he said


There is no doubt Saddam’s departure has made a massive to people’s lives in Iraq, he says.


“People feel freer. Before, under Saddam, they were afraid for their safety. Now there is a different mood.”


Painful departure


Mr Shaheen has visited every three or four months since the fall of Saddam and is hoping to remain for longer periods later in the year.


Of Armenian origin, Mr Shaheen and his family left Iraq in July 1994 when a law banning alcoholic drinks from being served in hotels led to a swift downturn in business. This, combined with the embargo at the time and the generally sombre mood in the country, convinced him to leave.


“Social life was bad, business was down, and people’s mood was down. Intelligence people could come at any moment to take you away. People were always afraid.”


In the end, Mr Shaheen decided to leave, plumping for Turkey where he already had business associates and friends - although leaving Iraq was not easy.


“In Iraq, we lived like kings. In Turkey, we were just foreigners.”


Mr Shaheen hopes to be able to settle in Iraq as soon as the political situation stabilises. People are happy, but they would like to have authority given back to them, he says.


“There is no doubt that there is big business in Iraq in the long term. Property prices are now doubling. Iraqi people are good people. When the election happens, everything will be settled.”

News - New rights for gay couples

Saturday, May 17th, 2008

BBC Radio 4’s Money Box was broadcast on Saturday, 3 April, 2004, at 1204 BST.

The programme was repeated on Sunday, 4 April, 2004, at 2102 BST.

Click here for the top item on this programme

Gay and lesbian couples will have the opportunity to secure similar legal rights to married couples under the new Civil Partnership Bill.

After registering their partnership at a civil ceremony, the couples will gain a range of new rights and responsibilities, including the same tax treatment as married couples, social security and pension benefits; and full life assurance .

To discuss the bill, we were joined by Equality Minister Jacqui Smith, Money Box listener Ron Strank, Louis Letourneau from Isis Financial Planners Ltd; and Nigel Shepherd, Head of Family Law at Addleshaw Goddard.


Listen to this item

Further information:

Gay couples to get joint rights

At-a-glance: Partnership bill

Internet links


Post Office loans

Customers at Post Offices across the UK can now apply for personal loans of up to 25,000, following its launch of a range of new financial products.

Over the next 18 months the Post Office also plans to offer motor insurance, a credit card and savings account, as a result of its venture with the Bank of Ireland.

Mike Johnson reported on the strategy behind the plans, and asked if the products would be a good deal for consumers.


Listen to this item

Further information:

Post Office offers personal loans

Internet links


New bankruptcy rules

People who apply for bankruptcy can now be discharged after 12 months, following changes to the Enterprise Act, which took effect on Thursday.

Other changes to the law include the introduction of orders on dishonest, reckless or individuals of up to 15 years; and creditors will now have no legal claim on a bankrupt person’s home after three years.

With this relaxation in the rules, will we see a rush of for insolvency? We were joined by Nick Hood of insolvency practitioners Begbies Traynor to discuss the Act and its implications.


Listen to this item

Further information:

Pain relief for bankrupts

Internet links


Second home council tax rise

People who own more than one property are facing a big rise in the council tax they pay for their second home.

Council tax rise
We asked for your comments on second homes getting charged more council tax

This is what you had to say

Until now, these unoccupied residences have enjoyed a 50% reduction on the tax, but from now on local authorities will be able to charge up to 90% of the standard rate.

We were joined by Money Box listener Neil Towers who rents a flat in Norwich - where he works - and also owns a home in London.

We also spoke to Norwich City Council Deputy Leader Hereward Cooke, and the BBC’s Local Government John Andrew.


Listen to this item

Further information:

Second home council tax rise

Internet links


House price surge gathers pace

Property prices jumped 2.2% in March, according to the UK’s biggest mortgage lender, the Halifax.

Further information:

House price surge gathers pace


Click to view or save to disk


Producer: Jennifer Clarke
Presenter: Paul Lewis
Reporter: Mike Johnson
Web Producer: Nathalie Knowles

News - Help with savings

Friday, May 16th, 2008
Christine Ross, head of financial planning a SG Hambros, answers your questions about investments.

Mr Shing Hong Pang received some free shares when Halifax became a PLC. He put them into a single company PEP so that he could benefit from the tax credit. The PEP company holding his shares is charging an annual management charge so is it still worth keeping them inside a single PEP after 6th April? He asks also if there is a way to take his shares out of the PEP and manage the shares himself without paying management fee?

Now that the PEP manager can no longer reclaim the dividend tax credit, the PEP will only offer protection from capital gains tax, unless Mr. Shing is a higher rate tax payer. If he does not use his capital gains tax allowance elsewhere, and pays basic rate tax, then he may be better off liquidating the PEP and avoiding the charges. If the PEP is liquidated, the shares will usually be sold by the manager and the cash returned. The manager is likely to levy charges to liquidate the PEP account so it will be necessary to do the sums to work out which is the best option.

Bob Pulham from Essex bought a TESSA in 1999 that matured this month. When he went to withdraw his investment, he was told that if he withdrew his balance there and then, he would not be able to use it to purchase a Tessa Maturity ISA elsewhere. Then he was told that the certificate would take 10 working days to reach him and if he transferred the TESSA it would take 30 days, with no interest being paid on his monies for that period. Can you clarify the new regulations in place regarding the maturing of TESSAs on 5th April?

All TESSAs are now maturing. As a reminder, we used to be able to contribute up to 9,000 over a period of 5 years to this tax free cash deposit account. TESSAs ceased to be available to new investors from 6th April 1999. Those with TESSA balances can still re-invest the capital (but not the interest) on a tax free basis. In order to continue to qualify for tax free savings the TESSA capital needs to be transferred to a TESSA-only ISA (TOISA).

I am surprised at the time it is taking some s to offer transfers to their customers and from some of the emails received the delays that are being experienced. Everyone is allowed to transfer their balances. If you are with the service you are receiving, I would suggest that you should first complain in writing to your TESSA provider. You may wish to address your complaint to their compliance officer. If your complaint is not resolved then you can contact the Financial Ombudsman Service.

Many of our viewers are having problems retrieving maturity certificates for their ISAS. Mr Atkins from Norwich wrote saying that he requested his certificates from the Woolwich on 15th January and has still not received them. This is losing him interest on his investment. Are these delays normal and can he do about it?

For what to do please see the answer above to Bob Pulham’s question.

Best TOISA rates:

  • West Brom BS, 5.75% 5 yr fixed, minimum 1,000
    For more information call:0845 330 0622

  • Portman BS, 4.8%, minimum 6,000
    For more information call: 0800 389 2732

  • Intelligent Finance, 4.6%, minimum 1
    Thank you for your very nice comments!

    Harry in Cardiff wrote - Dear Working Lunch. I have always admired your choice of financial experts but my favourite is Christine Ross. Intelligent, obviously top in her profession, a lovely face, a pleasant personality, but most importantly an excellent speaking voice. By the way, are Cash ISAs still a viable option?

    Thank you for your very nice comments!

    Yes, cash ISAs are still a viable option in that you can invest up to 3,000 each year and receive all interest tax free.

    Currently, the highest interest rates on offer for Cash ISAs are:

  • Intelligent Finance, 4.6%, minimum 1
    For more information call:
    0845 608 8388

  • Portman BS, 4.6%, minimum 3,000
    For more information call: 0800 389 2732

  • Marks & Spencer Money, 4.5%, minimum 10
    For more information call: 08000 282 824

    Mr Gay from Bristol asks - with the increase in Tax from April it seems the only benefit to a self select ISA plan would be Capital Gains tax which could be offset by the cost of managing the plan. Is a better option to withdraw the capital?

    If you do not need the protection from capital gains tax that the ISA offers, and if you pay income tax at the basic rate only, then the ISA will no longer offer you any tax advantages. Before taking any action check the charges on the plan, and also see what it will cost for the manager to liquidate it - they are unlikely to sell your holdings for nothing.

    Alistair Christie has just become a Grandad. He is looking for some advice as to special child friendly accounts where he can invest some money for his grandchild.

    Look around for the best cash deposit account - the ones designed specifically for children usually offer better rates. They will also offer some extra perks like birthday cards and child focused newsletters to encourage saving and make it more interesting for a in future years. You can find details of the best rates on the internet at www.moneyfacts.co.uk.

    You can open the account as trustee, and will be able to operate it until your grandchild reaches age 18. It is important to remember the tax rules, at least until the child trust fund comes into effect. Children, like adults, have a personal tax allowance (4,745 for the 2004/05 tax year). Interest earned in a savings account that does not exceed the allowance is therefore tax free. Make sure that you complete Inland Revenue form R85 when you open the account (the bank or building society can give you this). However, there is a restriction of the amount of interest that can be earned tax free where the gift is from a parent. In this case, only the first 100 of interest earned each year (per parent) is tax free. If interest exceeds this limit, then the whole of the interest earned is taxed on the parent. Therefore, it might be a good idea to open two accounts: one for parental gifts and one for gifts from other relatives and friends.

    When the child trust fund comes into effect, parents, relatives and friends will be able to contribute up to 1200 per year into an account or investment plan, which will grow tax free. By starting now it is possible to build up the account, ready for transfer into the child trust fund. I am sure that banks and building societies will want to start marketing early and are bound to offer child trust fund ‘feeder accounts’ soon to capture new investors in advance of the launch.

    Andrew Wraith has recently graduated and is working as a trainee solicitor. In April the Student Loans Company will begin taking out monthly payments direct from his salary to pay back the 16,000 he borrowed. He asks if it is best to pay 100 more than the bare minimum deducted or better to invest that 100 into some high interest savings account?

    It is almost always a good idea to reduce debt as quickly as possible and paying 100 extra each month is a good idea. If you are still tempted to ‘beat the system’ then check what rate of interest you are paying on your student loan and then compare this with the highest deposit rate you can achieve. You might be able to make a little profit on the difference - especially if you can use your ISA allowance and make a tax free return on your cash. Don’t be tempted to invest in the stockmarket to beat the loan interest rate - it’s much too risky to do this.

    Margaret Truman is a 82 year old widow. She has trusted her savings to an Independent Financial Advisor who has now retired from his partnership and is therefore no longer registered but has offered to look after her affairs on a ‘friendly basis’. Is this advised and what safeguards or redress would she have if something went drastically wrong?

    It is against the law for a financial adviser to operate without being authorised. I appreciate that Mrs Truman will have built up a good relationship with her adviser. Her affairs are probably in good order and may now be such that they do not need to be altered much. She may simply need someone to keep an eye on things and make her aware of any changes.

    If her current adviser is suggesting that he points out any tax changes in the annual Budget or lets her know of some major change at an investment company in which she holds investments, this is probably just friendly advice. However, this offers no safeguards nor any opportunity for redress if things go wrong. Advice should only be taken from an appropriately authorised individual. Mrs Truman should carry out any financial transactions only through an authorised individual or firm. All cheques should be make payable to the financial institutions in which Mrs Truman is investing, and not to any named individual.

    Mrs Hatch from Kent has asked whether investments in foreign banks regulated by our FSA have the same protection as monies invested in UK Banks?

    A very interesting point. If the entity is based in the UK, but is a branch of an overseas financial institution, then redress and compensation is governed by the jurisdiction in which the company is based. For example, if a French bank has a London branch which incurs difficulties, compensation is governed by French rules, although the UK branch will be regulated by the Financial Services Authority. However, if the entity is a separate subsidiary company, established in the UK, then UK rules apply. The way to check this out is to ask for a copy of the Terms and Conditions relating to the account that you propose opening. This must give full details of the investors compensation scheme that will apply.

    Mrs Brenda Marsh from Worcester wrote in to say that on Tuesday’s programme she thought she heard Adam say that a person could have up to 3 mini ISA’s in the same tax year. Her husband opened up a second mini ISA but the Inland Revenue got in touch to say that he had to close one down and return the interest and an amount of tax.

    Adam was right, you can have up to three mini ISAs: a cash mini, a stocks and shares mini, and an insurance mini. But you cannot have two mini ISAs of the same type, e.g. you cannot have two cash mini ISAs. I am taking a guess that this is where Mr. Marsh might have gone wrong.

    Ian Dalziel from Cardiff writes asking did Gordon Brown set up tax-exempt Property Investment Funds in the Budget? If so are they the same as already existing funds?

    Gordon Brown gave the go-ahead for the of Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) and launched the process. They are not the same as existing property funds. We will have to wait for the outcome of the consultation and it will be a while before this new type of investment is launched.


    The opinions expressed are Christine’s, not the programme’s. The answers are not intended to be definitive and should be used for guidance only. Always seek professional advice for your own particular situation.