Window locks and sophisticated alarms are all very well, but the answer to stopping burglars could well be knowing your next-door neighbour’s name and regularly twitching your curtains.
“There is no such thing as society,” said Margaret Thatcher, which has since been interpreted by critics as the zenith of the every man for himself attitude.
But the then prime minister also went on to say: “There are individual men and women, and there are families. And no government can do anything except through people, and people must look to themselves first. It’s our duty to look after ourselves and then to look after our neighbour.”
This echoes the current government’s reported consideration of “don’t moan, take action” as a slogan for tackling of anti-social behaviour - that the first defence against crime is the attitude of the individuals affected.
While bobbies on the beat and tougher sentences are the most popular solutions to crime, a Home Office report now says “social cohesion” and crime levels are connected.
 |
COHESIVE COMMUNITIES
Sense of belonging
Common vision
Diversity appreciated
Similar life opportunities
Relationships between people of different backgrounds
Source: Home Office
|
The study, which interviewed 10,000 people in 20 areas, found a sense of community is the strongest indicator of crime rates, particularly burglary and vehicle crime. As a predictor, it’s more important even than deprivation levels.
Prof Alex Hirschfield, director of the Applied Criminology Centre at the University of Huddersfield, has studied this phenomenon before.
“The most cohesive areas have crime rates similar to middle income areas. If you see somebody walking down the street in a cohesive area, perhaps going equipped for burglary, you have individuals that would challenge that individual, raising the risk of them being apprehended.”
So those nostalgic for the days of streets of terraces policed by fastidious residents might just have a point.
Recent arrivals
The death of traditional industries, extended families broken up by the search for better jobs, places where ethnic groups don’t intermingle, and the rise of the singleton - each a factor in the rise of places where people do not have the sense of belonging and fellow feeling they once did.
Nostalgic for the good old days?
|
Prof Hirschfield says that neighbourhoods where people don’t talk to each other have many recent arrivals and people living in rented accommodation. Nor are there residents’ association or community activities. “Socially mixed and very heterogeneous areas in terms of ethnicity do not tend to be the most cohesive.”
Which could describe London or other cities across the UK. How many of us can honestly say we ring the police when a car alarm goes off, or know the names of families at the other end of the street?
But it’s not simply that curtain twitchers defend their street against criminal strangers.
Criminologist Professor Paul Rock, of the LSE, explains that the pattern of where people commit crimes is like a dumbbell - a cluster where they live, another where they work and a thin strip between.
“Most offenders don’t tend to travel far from their own home. Familiarity with the housing type, familiarity with the terrain, you can make your exit quickly. People see the risk they will be recognised. In a cohesive community the ability to recognise is enhanced.”
In short, if your house is burgled it is likely to be by someone living nearby. And your chances of preventing that behaviour depend on the power of the community.
Criminologists and sociologists talk about “social control” - not vigilantes, but community “elders” who exert subtle pressure on offenders and their families.
Freedom v community
But in many deprived communities, there may be resistance against calling the police, either due to perceived police harassment, general ill-feeling towards the authorities, or a misplaced sense of solidarity. Those who do can often be intimidated, and not just by the suspects themselves.
But while many communities tolerate quite high levels of petty crime, there’s a notion of what is intolerable, says Prof Rock. “Over the more outrageous kinds of criminal activity - paedophilia, rape - cohesive communities do seem to be able to act together and almost drum people out of town.”
In London and other big cities some people speak of a trade-off - low community spirit, but more freedom and tolerance because of the lack of social control.
And community spirit can be a fragile thing. In Liverpool, Belle Vale and Netherley were new communities constructed in the 1960s and 70s as part of the efforts to improve housing conditions. James McLoughlin has lived in the area for 33 years and knows what it is like when community spirit leaves town.
“It was known as Alcatraz. There was a lot of crime. The council moved in problem families and community spirit went out of the window.”
Unlike the terraced houses in much of the rest of the city, there was little love for the mid-rise flats with their distinctive “walkways in the sky” - a now much-ridiculed facet of modernist planning.
“It was basically a haven for criminals. If the police were called, the criminals would be looking over the walkways laughing at them.”
But Mr McLoughlin has led local residents’ associations in encouraging people to report crime and anti-social behaviour, to install and maintain their own CCTV cameras, to get police to prevent intimidation of residents, and to lobby the council to maintain facilities.
Crime rates are down, house prices are up and community spirit is back, Mr McLouglin says. “People are becoming more and more together, interacting.”
And if Belle Vale can restore community spirit, there might just be hope for all of us.
Add your comments on this story, using the form below.
It’s a valid point about the tolerance and community tradeoff. It’s interesting to note that tightly knit communities tend to allow fear of the unknown to flourish. Back in the days of small local communities the arrival of an ethnic minority family or a homosexual relationship forming between locals would have caused an outcry. It wasn’t only criminals who got drummed out of town.
Stacy Smith, Sheffield
Interesting arcticle. Im a singleton and live in NW London and my experience seems to be contrary to your findings.
I live in a small 4 storey L shaped council block of 35 flats and maisonettes (inc small walkways in the sky) A mixture of half private and half council tenants with families, pensioners and singletons all mixed in.
We have a few people renting their private flats out and a mix of immigrants in the block.
This aside it is a very socially cohesive block of homes. Ive been there 5 years, others have topped 30 years.
We all know each other by sight and say hello on the stairs/street, aided by a shared garden which we all overlook, sit in and kids play in, and we have meetings maybe twice a year. We call on each other if we have a problem with our homes such as a leak or a fuse has gone etc. It feels to me like the safest place Ive ever lived with lots of freedom and tolerance.
Michelle, London
We got to know our neighbours. They were very friendly, always willing to help out, all the children in the street used to play together, the parents became good friends of us all. 6 months after they moved in, the father burgled our house whilst we were away! Get to know your neighbours… perhaps that should be carry out a security check on everyone you live next to before you get too friendly!
Anon, Derby
As an architect I always find these debates about the advantages of community v crime interesting. We were taught about the important link between the two, in the 80s just as society was supposedly dying, from theories decades old. It amazes me that we keep re-discovering the importance every few years.
I have the good fortune to live in a village where the sense of community is part of what makes it such a wonderful place to live. I can name all my neighbours, for the full length of the street and I can name lots on most of the other streets in the village. We do all look out for each other, both old and young. Oh and the crime rate is very low. The death of community/society has been greatly exaggerated - at least outside of London.
Vicky Smith, Stourbridge
I for one am reassured by the fact I have nosy neighbours! My next door neighbour sees and hears everything and whilst it is sometimes a nuisance I am always glad to know she is keeping an eye on my home when I’m on holiday or away for a few days.
Alison, Newcastle
In Japan, everybody knows their neighbour - it is customary to introduce yourself and bring a small gift when moving to a new place. You may rely on them to check on you/pull you out of the rubble after an earthquake.
SL, Japan
So why has crime fallen so much since the 1980s, if it’s all about ‘community cohesion’? I doubt that the correlation is half so definite as this article implies. There are more important factors at work here.
Lucy, Leeds, UK
This is so true! But surely if I ask a stranger why he is in the area, his right not to be asked is greater my right to ask him? Scrap rights and put in a code of practice instead, with actual acceptable words! In the US, kids are taught to respond to strangers ‘You’re not family’. No-one takes offence at this phrase.
Diane, Sutton, UK
I agree with the article. I also feel lucky because I don’t have any neighbours and am perfectly relaxed about leaving my front door wide open (not just unlocked) when I go out, or leaving the keys in the car. I used to live in a city and found that I was scowled at with suspicion for saying hello to neighbours. Forget the city, live in the country - its better for you!
Steve, Carnwath
Communities can only do so much. I live in an area close to council, and housing association properties. Large estates can breed terrible social problems, and when you live on the outskirts of it, dealing with the problems can be traumatic. Our area is close knit, we all know each other and look after each other, but it doesn’t stop the crime.
Many youngsters do not respect anyone, and certainly not authority. The UK has got too lenient in many ways. Also, in our area police resource is a problem. They do their best, but there are not enough police that can perform arrests. The rise of the community support officer, just means a cheaper option, with no authority in my opinion. I don’t normally agree with Tony Blair, but when it comes to social problems, I think you have to get tough. Many of these areas that breed criminals are not short of money and are not deprived, they just don’t respect anyone.
Beryl, Runcorn
Sadly in today’s society your neighbours are probably burglars too! Particularly where I live at the moment - in a very transient mostly rented environment with some flats owned by irresponsible housing associations who fill them with all sorts of anti-social types.
Shaun, London UK
An interesting idea but if you, for example, are one of a white minority living in a mostly Asian/Muslim area then you are automatically excluded from the local community. Most of the people in our area won’t even respond when I say ‘Good Morning’ or ‘Good Evening’ as I pass them on the street.
Stephen Mortimer, Reading, UK
It’s all good and well knowing your neighbours and curtain twitching but there are no local workable reporting and feedback mechanisms in place to encourage people to report anti-social behaviour in confidence.
Marie, london
Many people do know who is commiting the crimes but they are afraid of criminal damage to them or their property. I know its happened to me, in 2004, I made a comment to a mother regarding the riding of motocycles on the pavements by her kids and had first eggs then bricks thrown at the windows. I also called the police on an occassion when I saw someone trying to climb into a neighbours garden, the kids ran off not very far away and one threatened my husband with a golfclub when he gave chase.
Earlier this year the youths came back and broke our front gate, although on that occasion their actions were spotted by an off duty Met police officer who arrested them. On Monday a boy from the same family that smashed my windows who happens to have an asbo against him tried and succeeded in intimidating me as I walked past him. Have I contacted the police? No, to be frank with you I can’t afford the insurance bills nor am I prepared to face the baldfaced lying that will occur if I do say anything. Your report does not deal with the fear issues in such communities and insultingly tars us all with a solidarity with petty criminal types that in all probably does not exist, what evidence is there for this claim? Any ill feeling towards the authorities comes from a sense of achieving nothing for helping.
Karen Goldberg, Gravesend / Kent
This is all well and good, but what if (like me) you live on a street with a high turnover through rented accommodation, Asbo wielding chavs, and religious nutters? It’s difficult enough to even talk to my neighbours, let alone be friends with them!
Robert, Cardiff, UK
I wish our neighbourhood were “more together, interacting”… in our neighbourhood there is far too much jealousy as to who has the best house, car etc. In fact I think if anybody had their home or car damaged or broken into there would even be feelings of glee from some.
Jan, Croydon
I certainly feel a greater sense of security knowing that I know my neighbours and that some of them are ‘curtain twitchers’. Any unusual happenings would be noticed.
Freda McIntosh, Inverurie, Aberdeenshire
What incentive is there for public-spirited citizens to get involved when they are more likely to be punished than the offenders if there is injury sustained. There are far too many people willing to condone bad behaviour because of poor social background etc. It is not, and never has been, any excuse for becoming a serial criminal. Get tough with these louts, and stop expecting the public to do the job.
Jon, Norwich
We see this in Welsh-speaking areas of Wales. Immigrants move in and, by and large, refuse to learn our language. This destroys the community.
Huw Roberts, Caerdydd, Cymru
We’re just about to put our house on the market and I am terribly sad to be moving away from our fantastic neighbours. We owe them a huge amount - they’ve watched over our property while we’re away, took out the bins when we’ve forgotten and generally made us feel safe and secure. It has been a great street to live in, with a real sense of community. I didn’t believe this kind of thing still existed in urban Britain.
Ellie, Edinburgh
What has been said in this article about communities working cohesively to tackle crime also applies to communities of interest like church congregations. I have seen many articles in the BBC newsfeeds of churches being vandalised or robbed and the vicars / pastors and congregations in these churches can work together to protect these churches.
We just simply need to be vigilant while we go about our worship at these premises and look for anything that is out of the ordinary. For example, if a stranger is tracking where the collection baskets or plates end up after the offering, or is paying attention to where valuable equipment or artefacts are being stored, we need to be ready to challenge that person.
Simon Mackay, Fairfield, Victoria, Australia
Terms & Conditions